We Need to Repeal the United Nations and not let anyone replace it

Vetoed United Nations appointee
To the left is Nikki Haley, to the right is Salam Fayyad

Nikki Haley plays a heroine by vetoing a United Nations act of villainy!

Beautiful news, humanity! The United States has recently vetoed a United Nations decision to appoint a former Arab League sponsor of terrorism to vocalize Libya! Frankly, this is a total victory for the forces of Individual Liberty! Specifically, this is because the United Nations was founded on bitter resentment of freedom. Basically, the evidence for this is the fact that the Soviet Union was one of the key founders. In other words, the UN was specifically crafted to try to wreck US legitimacy abroad and to give blatantly tyrannical regimes  imaginary ‘authority’ on global issues.

Okay, time for me to start with names and analysis. Basically, Nikki Haley is a libertarian-leaning conservative who happens to be governor of South Carolina. Also, she’s the specific person who claimed this great victory for Individual Liberty by vetoing the UN’s decision. She’s a heroine for vetoing the UN decision to appoint someone who ruled an Arab League proxy army from 2007 to 2013, someone called Salam Fayyad.

There’s no such thing as “Palestinian Refugees” or “Palestinian Civilians”

How can someone claim to cherish individual liberty and economic freedom, yet extend endless sympathy to a blatantly authoritarian proxy army? That’s all the Palestinians are! They are nothing but a proxy army. Well, self correction here, two proxy armies. One of them, Hamas, is a proxy army of Saudi Arabia. Meanwhile, their main rival Hezbollah is Iran’s.

Basically you won’t find any Palestinians who are not Islamic Totalitarians. In other words, all Palestinians believe in and act on systemic hostility to individual liberty.

What should the United States do next?

The United States should unilaterally abolish the United Nations. Basically, to do this, the United States must demolish the UN headquarters. Next, the US needs to use economic and diplomatic means to make it impossible for the UN to set up new headquarters elsewhere on Earth. That way individual liberty will be back to having the global upper hand again.

Advertisements

Iran Is Still an Islamic Statist Regime, Despite arresting Islamic Statists

The chiefs of Iran
Iran’s government officials making military plans

Iran recently arrested some Islamic Statists for trying to shred an Iranian civil ceremony.

A short time ago, the Islamic State known as Iran has arrested some Islamic Statists sponsored by one of its neighbors. However, it is not clear which of its neighbors sent them. Basically, if you don’t know, they are a big time sponsor of Jihadi terror. Frankly, they’re the 3rd largest sponsor of terrorism to only Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. Specifically, they’re a theocratic oligarchy posing as a republic and who forces politicized Shia Islam onto its people. However, they are the only Islamic State that thrives on Shia nationalism. Generally, all other Islamic States, including Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, thrive on Sunni nationalism.

What do I mean by Sunni and Shia nationalism?

Basically, there are two main sectors of the Islamic faith, Sunni and Shia. The divide between the two is over whether Islam prophet and Koran author Muhammad chose an intellectual heir. Frankly, what I have gathered, Sunnis are the ones saying yes while Shias are the ones saying no. But what of the contrast between the religious nationalisms?

According to the behavior of Iran vs the behavior of other Islamic States, there’s very little contrast. Sunni nationalists are the Islamic Statists who want to turn the entire planet into an authoritarian monarchy. Meanwhile, their Shia counterparts are those who want to make our planet an authoritarian oligarchy. Other than this, both sides of the Islamic Statist movement want to make our planet our a unitary Islamic Theocracy.

How do Iran and its fellow Islamic States spread Islamic Statism?

Looking at the World Fact Book, Islamic Statists finance themselves and each other by being a petroleum culture. Broadly, more of an all of the above brand of Fossil Fuel culture. Granted, they have other industries they as theocracies sustain themselves with, but fossil fuel does almost all of the sustaining.

Should the American military do anything?

Depends! What is the job of the US Military? Basically, the job of the US military is to defend human beings in general from Initiations of Force. Specifically, initiations of force that are done for political and religious goals with nothing to do with defense. And in regard to how to address Iran, it is obviously no different. Incessantly, Iran has asserted openly that they are obsessed on doing the initiation of force for the religious (non-defensive) goal of making the globe a theocratic big-government oligarchy.

So far as I can tell, to defeat any Islamic Statist regime, whether it’s Saudi Arabia, Pakistan or Iran; I say we need to recycle an American Civil War policy. Specifically, we need the US military to take General Sherman’s policy toward Slavery South plantation economics and apply it to Islamic Theocracy fossil fuel economics.

Top Fed Reserve member Quits, Excellent news for banks!

whats wrong with central banking
Federal Reserve member quits banking!

Banking on its way to freedom due to federal reserve shrinking over bank deregulation!

Gorgeous news, other people! Recently, the federal reserve just lost one of its top workers due to much needed bank deregulation! Frankly, this is ultimate beauty for human progress toward ultimate individual freedom! However, this is only the start of a walk up the right path. Basically one may be reading this and asking ‘what happened?’, and the answer is easy. Daniel Tarullo, an obstructionist of individual sovereignty over one’s own finances, resigned after 7 years of central planning. From 2007 to 2009 he was one of the many culprits of the giant crash that happened then. Thankfully, there is a case to be made now better than ever for Ending the Fed!

In Defense of Free Banking

Basically, the most stable system of banks in all of human history was done in Scotland. Specifically, this system was between 1715 and 1845. Twas three central banks with small accountability, and legions of private banks with huge accountability. Therefore, banks were mutually accepting each others’ currencies, and banking on planet Earth had never been more sane than elsewhere on Earth or in history. However, there is the question of how this can be applied to American banking in the Digital Age. Basically we need to analyze what banking is like in the Digital Age before we can answer that.

Banking of the Digital Age in the United States

Overall, the amount of banks and currencies, even payment methods, that spawned after the birth of the Internet… are legion. Here is a simple list of Digital Age contributions to banking.

  1. PayPal and its Bill Me Later credit cards
  2. BitCoin
  3. Stripe
  4. Google Wallet
  5. Apple Pay
  6. Crypto Currency
  7. Virtual Currency
  8. Amazon’s Rewards credit cards

Okay, now let’s look at who’s allowed to make governmental currency. The Constitution makes it pretty clear that only Congress can issue American Dollars, not a federal reserve.

What concrete policy is there to enact then?

Firstly, make it a Bill to be voted in favor of by 60% or more of Congress. Then the president must sign it to go into effect shortly after signing. Okay, but what about the contents of the Bill? Well, call it the ‘Scottish Banking Lessons for America Act‘. Frankly my advise for such an act is to write it to declare that “The Federal Reserve shall be shut down during or before the 2020 national election”, for starters.

Then have the next sentences be “All private banks and banking sectors of internet servers, from now on, have the freedom to issue their own currencies. However, banks are utterly not free to break the laws of supply and demand or to break the golden rule or else those that do will lose this freedom”. And have how many years a bank who breaks these easiest rules ever goes without this freedom match the number of different ways in which they broke these no-brainer rules. Long story short, no other legislation needed here!

US Military Faces Need to Raise its Budget and its Wages

Military Pilots
Couple of US Military Pilots

American Military may need to raise budget and wages due to demand surpassing supply.

WOW! The US Military has recently gotten perhaps the most organic lesson in economics I have seen them learn! Specifically, they are experiencing more demand for their service than they can supply. Basically this means the US military will have to raise its own budget, setting aside what Congress or Donald Trump or anyone else says. How is this an accurate assumption about US defense funding? Frankly there are many factors we have to account for in this analysis. Firstly there is the fact that a free and therefore stable economy is one that works within the rules of supply and demand. Basically when there is more demand than supply, then budgets, profits and wages all go above averages. However, if there is less demand than supply, the opposite happens, going below averages. Lastly if demand equals supply, then all of these match what’s monetarily normal.

Congress must let the US Armed Force fund itself!

Although Congress has the authority to change the defense budget every two years, they do not have the authority to do anything about the rules of supply and demand. Frankly, the US military has proven it can efficiently fund itself without taxes. The best example for this claim of mine is the Toys for Tots charity the US Marines do at least every winter. However this is not the only way the US Armed Force can fund itself. Also consider that lotteries tend to be the most popular means for non tax revenue among government programs. And please do not blindly believe me on this, think of Connecticut state lottery instead. Plus, out of individualism, I suspect there are plenty of US generals willing to open State Owned Enterprises such as military history museums.

Should Royalty deals be made for the US military?

Of course! For example, I will be more than happy to cut a royalty deal with the US military regarding my graphic novels. Once I get the mythology for them patented, I’ll lend them a decent share of every profit I make. Plus, this is how I plan to famish the Internal Revenue Service on a one man basis. Matter a fact, I have other plans for my other for-profit hobbies as well, for ending the IRS.

Therefore, if I have any Americans reading this who got Asperger’s like I got, then I advise onto you. Make royalty deals with out national defense and/or with state and local government services. Because this is how those of us who are giant nerds like me Make Taxation Theft Again.

What can the US military do to grow how peopled it is?

Frankly, US strategists and tacticians can expand the pool of qualified volunteers. Basically these strategists and tacticians do this by opening classrooms that are about the science, history, and/or philosophy of military affairs. However, such classrooms cannot be funded through taxation or other coercive means. Instead, these guys and gals should charge user fees and rental fees for the students. Basically the students who give their best effort will pass such classes. Therefore, the passing students will be the ones who qualify to voluntarily sign up for military service.

Kosovo and Serbia cannot afford war with each other

Kosovo Excavation
Excavators in Kosovo tearing down the Serbian wall

Kosovo and Serbia cannot afford war with each other, here’s why.

So, there’s rumors floating around over how Serbia might handle Kosovo unmaking a Serbian border wall. Specifically, the rumor that’s making me analyze this news is a rumor of the 2 taking up arms on each other. Basically, I’m making a case for these two nations setting this wall thing aside. Both of these nations have bigger problems to worry about. Also, many of these bigger problems require teamwork between these nations. For these two to slay over a border wall would make their shared problems worse. However, allow me to state where I am with border policy. For all nations, I think the proper migrant policy is total freedom of movement with Ellis Island model border controls. Okay, onto my case.

1. Serbia is, mostly, a free society

According to Cato Institute, Serbia is a freer society than even our OECD friend known as Turkey. Broadly speaking, Serbia also has mixed feelings about America. Frankly, most Serbians hate American government but love American society and American people. Often, its been said that their hostility to US federal government is due to NATO breakup of Yugoslavia.

2. Kosovo is hotly against Islamic Statism

Frankly, 80% of Kosovo strongly rejects the ideology of Islamic Statism. Plus, Kosovo is right there with Albania and Bosnia in standing against it. Basically most of the people their would rather their country be a free society with limited government. However, Cato makes the mistake of not reporting the status of Liberty in Kosovo, and instead I must turn to other sources.

Generally, this is a nation that has midsize civil liberty added with the 13 highest ease of doing commerce. Also, their economy is slightly more free market than planned market.

3. Both nations share a mutual enemy known as Islamic Statism.

Apparently Serbia built the border wall to keep out Islamic Statists. However, the fatal flaw in that intent is most of Kosovo is against Islamic Statism. Plus, both nations are hostile to this enemy ideology, and for these two to fight each other would only give their mutual foe an upper hand against both societies.

Graft is Fraud, but Anti-Graft law got turned down?

Protest in Romania over Graft
Romanians protesting a law against fraud?

Romanians Chastise Their Government Over Anti-Graft Measures. What Were the measures?

Graft. Honestly, I was not aware of this word until I read this story about Romania. Specifically, in Romania, the society is protesting its government over how it wishes to fight graft. Generally speaking, it’s a purely monetary form of fraud. Apparently, this type of fraud is one that appears to be, at least in economics, about breaking the rules of supply and demand. So by English definition, libertarians like me should be against this behavior. But in all fairness to the protestors, we as a movement we need to oppose tyrannical rule as well. Basically, there are some questions we need to ask ourselves as a movement.

1. How did Romanian Government propose fighting this type of fraud?

Evidently, the national government over there was going to ease penalties for power abuses by politicians. Frankly, someone like me should easily be worried for the Romanian People. However, so should a party like the one I’m a member of. Sadly, though, many in my party openly sympathize with corrupt regimes just because they’re not on US soil. On the other hand, I am going to extend both sympathy and advise to the Society of Romania, not its government.

2. How can Romanian Society fight against graft independently of government?

Honestly, I’m no lawyer nor am I aspiring to become one, but what I do know is there are only three kinds of behaviors one can call ‘evil’. Fraudulent acts, property crimes, and non-defensive force. And it appears as though this controversy in Romania is exploding over a fraudulent act I’ve never heard of until tonight. However, it’s time for me to propose something to the Romanian individuals and society for how to address their government. Basically my advise to them is to assemble directly in Romania’s presidential house’s front yard. Specifically, protest at them with signs ordering your regime to remove any economic rule that’s not a rule of supply and demand. However, I think it’s equally important for you the People of Romania to have signs demanding government to play by the same rules for revenue (supply & demand + golden rule) as society.

3. Will the United States need to address this in any way?

Only by economic means if so, Romania is still found by Cato to be the 30th freest society on Earth, says this PDF file. In other words, I’m not sure if Romanians will truly need American rescue. But if they will, then this is how we rescue them. We unilaterally cut their tariffs, taxes and regulatory burden to total and utter zero. This way any tyranny in Romania would be crushed without killing any US soldiers or any Romanian civilians.

To Celeb Stylists: Only Lady Gaga Should Decide What Clothing She Wears

Lagy Gaga, only person in charge of Lady Gaga's clothing.
Lady Gaga giving a speech, probably about football…

Clothing stylists can have their opinions about what a celeb looks best in, as long as they’re not imposed.

Before we begin, let me spit out a disclaimer. I am not a football person, but rather a big time Lord of the Rings nerd, Elder Scrolls nerd, Games Workshop hobbyist and most notably here a Liberty nerd. But I will happily go to Super Bowl parties just to make new friends and eat overly meaty foods. Also I am only a listener to two musical styles, Groove Metal and Movie/Game Score. Okay, now to the actual topic.

So various assorted celebrity clothing stylists have decided singer Lady Gaga would look good in certain costumes. However, I have no problem with this as they are free to state their views on what certain celebs look best in as long as they let the celebs make their own clothing choices. Basically you just walked in on a case for freedom of choice in clothes and fashions.

The Law Based Case!

Broadly there are a couple of cases I must make upon this day. I must use parts of the US constitution to make the Law case for freedom of clothing. Some organized religions either require or advise certain articles of clothing relevant to themselves as doctrines. To regulate religiously relevant clothes goes against the First Amendment as Unconstitutional. What of the kinds of clothes that are often regulated, from shirts advertising musicians to shirts showing certain arenas of skin? Basically, those too are guarded by the freedom of expression aspect of the 1st Amendment!

In addition, there is the Ninth Amendment. Basically, constitution author James Madison based the Ninth Amendment on a natural rights concept. Specifically to this topic, there is the unmentioned right to freedom of choice. So whether you speak of food, clothing, other necessity or some luxury, this amendment’s in favor of freedom of choice.

Lastly, the law case for freedom of choice invokes the 14th Amendment. Specifically the ‘Equal Treatment under the Law’ bit. One must use this to defend the enforced equal treatment for all people no matter their fashion sense.

The Economics Based Case!

Plus there is an Economics case to make for freedom of choice in clothing! Allowing consumers to choose their own clothing is good for the economy. And this is precisely because if the individual can make her own fashion choices without regulation then she only has to abide by the golden rule. Well, not only that but also the rules of supply and demand too. Generally the rules of supply and demand are simple.

If there is more demand than a business is able to supply, then prices will be higher than average. This will inherently lead to both huge profits and expensive wages. However, if there is less demand than a business is able to supply, prices are lower than average, profits are tiny and wages are affordable. So in this topic, doctrines like corporatism and socialism that are built on rejecting the rules of supply and demand inherently lead to the failure of the individual to clothe oneself at all. These are facts of life.

Therefore it is proper that we allow revealing clothing, normal clothing etc. to only be limited by the rules of supply and demand!

As for the Super bowl Halftime Talks…

Honestly, I do not know what will happen with the game. All I know is that there are some stylists who were claiming they want to see a singer I don’t even listen to the music of dress certain ways. Lastly, this was just to educate those stylists about the need for freedom of choice in fashion.

Action on Old Intel Proves Only Congress Should Wage War.

Pentagon and Intel
The Pentagon seen from afar

Outdated Intel incident regarding Yemen confirms only Congress should be waging or declaring wars.

Intel that is exactly a decade old was acted on militarily in Yemen. Of course this came with self-crippling results for the US military. However, Yemen is an Islamic Statist regime and as such is at least a latent threat to the American People. Sadly, the US troops were rushed into Yemen by the White House with no clear plan. Basically what we are seeing is the result of impulse rule by the White House. Namely, this is an example of what happens without oversight by Congress! What does that even mean? It means that only Congress has the power to do military actions and to act on intel reports.

Building a Morality for War

How can we as libertarians, people who prize freedom and liberty above all else, build a morality for war? Our own morality for the military of America or any other free societies to abide by? Broadly, my camp has a severely flawed defense policy that makes no effort to answer these valid questions. However I’m ready to mix the most relevant libertarian values into a wise morality for war! Basically, the most topical libertarian values to this post are self-defense and constitutional jobs. So how about this for a morality.

  1. When the US military goes to war it should only be to secure economic freedom and personal liberty for the American People.
  2. Securing these requires intel that is from within the same week as also-needed approval by Congress.
  3. Intel report must consist of all 16 intel agencies saying at very high ratios that there’s either an imminent threat or a latent one.
  4. Then, after the first 3 rules have been met the US military needs to do all that’s needed to total end the enemy!
  5. Lastly, after the enemy is ended the US needs to bring a majority of troops home while leaving a few thousand behind to grow a Laissez-faire Economy.

Let’s return to the subject!

Okay, so Yemen may be of latent threat to the American People but that does not justify acting on decade-old intel! Rather that justifies having a clear entry plan, battle plan and exit plan. One could have intel on Saudi Arabian sponsorship of terrorism and it would still have to be recent to really do anything with. Basically, the question for intel are, or should be, rather easy to ask. Firstly, how old or new is the intel we are analyzing? Also, what does this gathering prove about the subject? Even the intel agents themselves should know it is national suicide to pretend to know everything!

France Takes First Step in Right Angle Against Islamic Statism!

Woman of military of France
French military heroine who shot a pawn of Islamic Statism!

France Has its Military standing up to Islamic Statist bullies, predators, and terrorists! Go France!

France has a supreme heroine in its military! Some Islamic Statist decided to take a machete and butcher every woman in a French platoon. But they retaliated instantly, or rather, the French woman warrior above preempted the barbarian. As in she shot that Statist filth almost to death when he was right about to chop someone down the head! However, I have some constructive criticism for the French military. I want the French to know that they have taken the first step to waking up to individual right of self-defense. More broadly, also societal right of self-defense! Okay, that sounds more like a compliment but my intent still stands. Firstly, we must look at the history of French society and Greater Middle East society relations.

Greater Middle Eastern & French Relations History

Islamic Statist initiations of force against France for political and social goals dates back to the Medieval Times. For example, the Islamic Statists kicked off their relations with the French by attempting to murder it. Therefore in the year 732 the Battle of Tours happened. Much later in 1954 that Statist scum incited a civil revolt by Algeria against the French. However this ended with a 1962 truce. And of course these days, if you go here and do control (command on Apple OS) + [F] and type ‘France’ into the find bar you’ll see the Islamic Statists have violated France about 49 times between late 2001 and now.

What’s next for the French military to do?

Basically, the French intel agencies need to learn all they can about State Sponsors of Islamic Statist acts of terror. And then they will find that it’s any nation where Sharia applies in full.

Purple = full Islamic Statism
Islamic Statism by country (purple = Islamic Statist regime)

Or the people of France can just use this map above to figure out which societies are their enemy. It’s the ones shaded in purple.

Then given the 49+ Islamic Statist attacks including the one this post is commentary on, I say onto France:

  • You have a duty to the French people to totally destroy every Legit Military Target under the control of these regimes, and to include any and all government program actors and institutions under those regimes as LMTs. However, then I’d advise that you bring a huge majority of troops home and leave a few thousand behind in each land. This would be to foster the growth of a laissez-faire economy with no monopolies.

Trump Disrespects Autonomy of Israel, Dictates how it Defends itself.

Israel Defense Women
Three perfect women in the only military that treats women like people.

Donald Trump slaughtered my tolerance of the American Electorate. By nannying Israel as NOT needed, telling it how it can defend itself!

How did he do so? Well, he recently nannied Israel, the only free society in the Middle East, about how it can defend itself. Specifically, he warns Israel against building new villages in its capital Jerusalem. And thus Trump has proven that he is underserving of the role of 45th president. Firstly was him having a chance to assimilate refugees into US culture and US military and blowing it. Secondly was him allying with Islamic Statism against Islamic Statism. Thirdly was Trump throwing egregious slander at Australia over the phone. And now, lastly, we see him nannying out best friend and the freest society in the Middle East how it is allowed to defend its population.

Why I side with Israel on the Arab-Israeli Conflict.

It is very clear that this nation has the best status quo of any Middle East nation on Individual Liberty. Cato Institute even finds they are number one in the region on human freedom. Also, this is a nation that is around fifth or sixth in the Middle East for economic freedom. In fact, when it comes to doing freedom and liberty in a Mid-Eastern society, Israel’s at or near the top of doing these like a libertarian. Look:

  1. Government Accountability: Near the regional top
  2. Freedom from Slavery: At the regional top
  3. Enabling Free Trade: At the regional top
  4. Based on this PDF file:
    1. At the regional Top for freedom of religion
    2. Near the regional Top for bioethical freedom (only Tunisia does it better)
    3. At the regional Top for sexual freedom
    4. At the regional Top for family & gender liberty
  5. Something from Cato Institute about Human freedom
  6. Something from Cato Institute about Economic freedom.

Israel shares U.S. libertarianism’s domestic policy virtues, other Greater Middle East countries do not. Thus in total, there are nine reasons I support Israel and oppose any foes it has in its region. The Arab League is nothing morally better than an Arab nationalist copy paste of the Nazi Empire. Also, all the Palestinians are is a proxy army for this League, and those of them who are not are instead proxy army of Iran.

How Trump is siding against Israel by nannying them.

Frankly, only free societies like America and Israel deserve unconditional societal Right of Self-Defense, including Defense of Others. Plus there is OECD friendship to note between us and them, and we do trade with them. Donald Trump is forsaking all of this by disrespecting the national independence of the only nation of the GME who behaviorally deserves national autonomy. By nannying Israel about how it can and cannot defend its people, Trump is empowering the Arab League and it does not matter whether he means to or not.

How this warrants blanket hatred of U.S. Voters

Cozying up to enemies, smearing some friends over the phone while nannying others, and having our enemies assimilate and militarize the refugees instead of us doing it. All of the above is what the morons of the Republican Party nominated. All of the above is what the morons of this Populism-vs-Elitism fetish voted for. Lastly, all of the above is what the morons of vote by one’s feelings alone brand of thinking voted for. No more respect for voters in the United States from me. Could have taken this grandmaster of learning called the Internet and Googled ‘Third Party’ during Primary Season of 2016.